It's interesting that two reporters (supposedly) went to the same court to cover the same story and came out with differing information on which lawyers were representing which accused.
In the Guardian's version, Francis Joseph tells us that Israel Khan represented murder-accused Shelly-Ann Anganoo: "Senior State attorney Kathy-Ann Waterman-Latchoo appeared for the State; Hayden St Clair Douglas for Pooran, and Israel Khan and Daniel Khan represented Anganoo."
But Express reporter Joel Julien tells us that "Attorneys Israel Khan SC, St Clair Douglas, Dawn Mohan and Daniel Khan appeared for Pooran while Osbourne Charles SC, Keith Scotland and Anil Maharaj appeared for Anganoo."
Hmmmmm. Who is correct?
At least they both have the state attorney's name correct, as well as the presiding judge.